Very sweet of you to take such an interest in fraud and crime, L Power [or whoever you are]. And you do take an obsessive interest in it. Do you not have other hobbies, or a real job?
Although it seems to
be a fun job shooting down other folks you have never met from the
safety of your home, I wonder if you have the courage to tell us a
little about yourself. It's one thing to mock something someone else has
said, but who are you, and what do you stand for? What you do for a
living, what's your version of the crime on November 1? Because if
we're going to discuss credibility to take you seriously we also need to
know whether you are credible [and at a minimum, honest].
course, no one - especially not you - will take such a genuine challenge
seriously. Because that's not what you're paid to do. Your remit is
to shoot the messenger in order to distract from the message.
going to discuss the actual narrative. We're not going to go into why
someone was accused of a crime in the first place! Haha what a joke.
it would be silly to even consider such a thing. We're not going to
talk about how someone was in a position to be a suspect, just how
corrupt an entire justice system is. But we are going to discuss in
detail the motives of the writer [to make a profit] and reviews you
don't agree with. Well Amanda Knox also wrote a book and made $4
million from it. Her family paid for PR. She has endlessly done the
rounds on television to promote her case. But in your view, any
discussion of this is unacceptable. A dissenting view has to be shot
down. Do you support free speech? Do you support the right of a human
being to have an opinion, or a discussion? Do you? Because what's odd
is when our views differ from yours you engage in character
In Dr Hodges new book we see the same people
running down his book with the same tired catchphrases. Do any of
those folks read the book? Did you? Have you read any of my books?
Then why are you reviewing them?
It makes me wonder...if
everything you say is tactical as opposed to honest, strategic as
opposed to heartfelt, contrived as opposed to authentic, how can any of
it be taking seriously? As such, fraud is an interesting word for you
to be using. Fraud is an interesting accusation to be made by you of
I've made a clear and unambiguous challenge to you here. I've asked you:
- to state who you are [what's your identity]
- to state what your job is
want to establish your credibility, and also your motive for
obsessively shooting down Pro Justice discussion. Are you prepared to
have a discussion on your credibility? Are you? In fact I'd like to extend this invitation to everyone on your side - your FBI profilers, all your experts. Deal? An open, honest discussion where we simply discuss credibility.
If you fail to
respond this challenge on its own merits, no excuses, no
justifications, simply answer the questions, if you don't we both know
exactly why, and so will other people. I won't be holding my breath for
your clever catchphrase, knee jerk response. I have actual, honest
work to do.