Sunday, April 11, 2010
Terreblanche case will hinge on quality of police work
SHOOT: Was there a condom or not? The official police position is that there wasn't. Interestingly the original reason given by the perpetrators was that ET owed them money. If this was not the real reason, that they had agreed to go there for some homosexual hanky panky, well, how would that sound? Personally it looks to me like his killers are culpable. Not only did they murder him together, and in a manner in excess of someone merely trying to escape, but they also robbed him. Their best defence as far as I'm concerned is that they killed while under the influence. Again, repeated blows to the face rather than one or two accidental blows is difficult to defend.